Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
153-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

153-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005805 50.852554)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005706 50.852544,-1.005710 50.852563,-1.005724 50.852581,-1.005746 50.852595,-1.005773 50.852604,-1.005804 50.852607,-1.005835 50.852605,-1.005862 50.852596,-1.005885 50.852582,-1.005899 50.852565,-1.005905 50.852545,-1.005900 50.852526,-1.005886 50.852508,-1.005865 50.852494,-1.005837 50.852485,-1.005806 50.852482,-1.005776 50.852484,-1.005748 50.852493,-1.005725 50.852507,-1.005711 50.852524,-1.005706 50.852544)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL